The official USAJFKSWCS website will migrate at the end of October 2026.

Please note that only minimal updates will be made to the current site during this transition. For any questions or assistance, please contact the Public Affairs Office at pao_swcs@socom.mil.

Special Warfare Journal Banner

Banner illustration for Stability by Design: How ARSOF Culture Empowers the Operator and Anchors the Household (AI image generated by Special Warfare Journal staff.)Stability by Design: How ARSOF Culture Empowers the Operator and Anchors the Household

Military service is built on a shared cultural identity. Conversations across the force often default to the concept that every Soldier is part of one Army. All Soldiers, from Stryker infantrymen to Special Forces weapons sergeants, share the foundational identity represented by the U.S. Army nametape worn above their heart. Likewise, every Soldier is bound by the same oath and serves the same Constitution. However, this shared foundation overshadows the profound organizational and cultural differences between the conventional force and Army special operations forces (ARSOF).
Results:
Tag: Mission Command

Banner image for Modern Warfare and Risk. A U.S. Army Green Beret assigned to 3rd Special Forces Group (Airborne), right, leads Air Force security forces personnel with the Air National Guard in a joint forceable entry, JFE, during a final culminating objective as part of exercise

Jan. 22, 2026

Modern Warfare and Risk

To maintain its decisive edge, the Army must shift its culture from a constraint-based mindset to one that strategically embraces prudent risk in decision-making. This recalibration is especially true for Special Forces commanders at lower echelons, who often operate with limited support and high autonomy. The Global War on Terror (GWOT) created a risk-averse culture and a lack of empowered leadership at lower echelons, which will limit the effectiveness of United States Special Operations Forces (SOF) support to conventional forces during future large-scale combat operations (LSCO). This article provides historical context for SOF risk tolerance, examines the challenges and benefits of high-risk operations, and identifies ways to develop risk-tolerant leaders.

Mission Command: Trust, Empowerment, and the Future Force banner. Maj. Gen. Gent Welsh, the Adjutant General, Washington National Guard, observes soldiers conducting their mission brief as part of a squad situational training exercise (STX) during Officer Candidate School (OCS) Phase III at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Wash., July 1, 2025. OCS Phase III is a culminating event that tests officer candidates on their leadership and critical thinking abilities before commissioning as second lieutenants. (U.S. Army National Guard photo by Sgt. Elaina Nieves)

Aug. 28, 2025

Mission Command: Trust, Empowerment, and the Future Force

Air Force Doctrine Publication 1 discusses mission command as a product of trust.01 It is a philosophy of leadership that empowers commanders and operators in uncertain, complex, and rapidly changing environments through trust, shared awareness, and understanding of the commander’s intent. Think back to Nimitz, the technological challenges of his era required trust, though it was his way of command regardless.02 Modernity, conversely, does not inherently demand it; in fact, it often eschews trust, with compartmentalized information viewed as devoid of the necessary context for proper understanding. The ever-present challenge in modern military affairs persists: higher headquarters making snap judgments without grasping the “atmospherics” of the situation.03 What then should commanders do with their pixel of information?

Special Warfare Journal Logo