Special Warfare Journal Banner

Results:
Tag: SOF

June 5, 2026

Perspectives: Civil Affairs in the Civil-Military Coordination Center, Israel

This article examines how Civil Affairs operates within the Civil-Military Coordination Center (CMCC) in Israel, highlighting the interplay with intergovernmental, international, and non-governmental organization (NGO) stakeholders. It underscores why understanding these dynamics are essential to effectively support humanitarian efforts and operational goals.

May 29, 2026

The U.S. Army's Bold New Approach to Psychological Operations and Cognitive Warfare

On April 2, 2026, the SOCoE graduated 44 its first class in the initial transformation of Psychological Operations, as part of the Total Army solution to cognitive warfare. The new graduates included PSYOP service members from all three components, Regular Army, National Guard, and Army Reserve, as well as members of the Joint Force.

May 20, 2026

Relationships Forged in Fire

Editor’s Note: This is the first time that this story has been documented from the U.S. side. The Soldiers in this story were never recognized for their actions; they did it selflessly because it was the right thing to do. This historical vignette is applicable to every Army Special Operations Forces (ARSOF) Soldier in our formation, especially as members of the Army’s premier partner force.

May 15, 2026

Masters of Chaos Theory: Why SOF Thrives in Ambiguity

Special Operations Forces (SOF) thrive in ambiguous, chaotic environments because the principles of chaos theory directly enable and accelerate innovation in modern warfare. To understand this connection, it is important to explore the interconnections between chaos theory and innovation. This analysis defines their key principles, highlights their similarities, and shows how SOF uniquely leverages these dynamics to create operational advantages.

May 1, 2026

General James Van Fleet: Lessons for Modern Special Operations Soldiers

One can be forgiven for not associating Gen. James Van Fleet with special operations or Special Forces. He is best known as the commander of the U.S. Eighth Army from April 1951 to February 1953 during the Korean War. The majority of Van Fleet’s career was spent in traditional infantry roles, as a machine gun battalion commander in World War I and as a regimental, division, and corps commander during World War II. However, his assignment as head of the Joint United States Military Advisory Group, Greece (JUSMAG-Greece) in 1948, and his leadership and design of “Operation Rat Killer” during the Korean War, should grab our attention.

March 12, 2026

Perspectives: The Weight of War and Reclaiming Combat Agility

The United States Army is currently undergoing a transition and restructuring period, which historically occurs at the end of prolonged conflicts, such as World War II, the Vietnam War, and the Global War on Terror (GWOT). During this transition period, the U.S. Army seeks to, once again, modernize its force structure and conduct a thorough review of its doctrine. Many experienced combat leaders will inevitably retire or leave the military, creating a heavy reliance on doctrine and institutional learning to fill the gaps left by these experienced veterans. As the U.S. Army conducts force-modernization and doctrinal changes, an emphasis should be placed on combat agility regarding the mission-essential equipment soldiers are required to carry into combat. Over the last few decades, rucksacks, personal protective equipment, and vehicles have become increasingly larger and heavier, increasing the weight and bulkiness of a soldier's equipment. The increase in weight and bulk degrades the mobility, sustainability, and lethality of U.S. Army soldiers, as additional carried weight increases fatigue, elevates sustenance consumption, and significantly reduces their ability to maneuver quickly and over long distances on the battlefield. This article examines mobility, sustainability, and lethality, and it provides recommendations for consideration during the U.S. Army’s current transformation period.

Feb. 27, 2026

Beyond Words: Rethinking Language's Role in Special Operations

In an era characterized by complex global dynamics and multifaceted threats, the United States Special Operations Forces (SOF) 's ability to engage effectively across diverse environments is paramount. For decades, a central tenet of special operations has been the importance of cultural and regional expertise. The ability of SOF to build relationships, navigate complex social terrains, and operate below the level of armed conflict is foundational to their success. While this requires a deep understanding of the operational environment, the specific role of language proficiency within that understanding has become a subject of intense debate.

Jan. 7, 2026

Supporting the Army Special Operations Forces-Space-Cyberspace Triad: Selection Criteria for Army Space Officers Supporting U.S. Special Operations Command

The preponderance of special operations forces (SOF) missions requires non-SOF support. There is only one Army Space officer (Functional Area 40) at every theater special operations command (TSOC) and Special Forces Group (SFG). These officers have an outsized impact on what commanders and units of action can accomplish operationally, or when preparing units of action to deploy forward (organizing, training, and equipping). At a TSOC, developing and directing lines of effort against an adversary’s communications architecture demands as much analytical rigor as ensuring units of action are properly equipped and trained to successfully contribute to a TSOC’s campaign support plan. While the Army’s talent management system has made positive strides in recent years, screening Army Space officers for service at SFGs or TSOCs warrants additional scrutiny. The suggestions below are scoped to Army Space officers due to the backgrounds of the authors, but this model could be applied to other low-density jobs in SOF, such as cyberspace or electronic warfare.

Dec. 5, 2025

On Leadership: 10 Rules of the Road from Senior Army Leaders

For the past three decades, the Army Values (Loyalty, Duty, Respect, Selfless Service, Honor, Integrity, and Personal Courage) have provided a constant guardrail for professional Soldiers as they navigate their careers. Yet, oftentimes we see Soldiers challenging, arguing against, or failing to adhere to these values in and out of uniform. Over the years, I've found that sticking to these precepts is often a recipe for a successful career. However, those who stray from the Army Values may need to reorient their compass and make a course correction, or they risk falling into legal, moral, or ethical problems.

Nov. 21, 2025

Military Culture Shift: The Impact of War, Money, and Generational Perspective on Morale, Retention, and Leadership by Corie Weathers

How often have you heard the phrase, “Today’s generation is so different?” With four generations of Americans serving across the joint force, a key challenge is the “messy dynamic” of leading and caring for them regardless of age, experience, or beliefs.

Special Warfare Journal Logo